Former Mentor Can't Stand It! Scott Bessent's Attempt to Suppress Long-Term U.S. Treasury Yields Backfires as 'Black Wednesday' Lessons Resurface

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently attempted to suppress long-term Treasury yields through bond buybacks, only to face public opposition from his former mentor, billionaire investor Stanley Druckenmiller, who bluntly stated that efforts by the government to resist market fundamentals and deliberately defend asset prices ultimately fail. The Financial Times similarly argued that Bessent's actions are merely applying a temporary 'band-aid' to structural problems in the U.S. Treasury market, with the real key to lowering long-term yields lying in improving U.S. fiscal health.

The backdrop to this debate is the persistent high levels of long-term U.S. Treasury yields. The 30-year Treasury yield recently surged to near 20-year highs, reflecting investors' demands for higher term premiums to bear the risks of long-term U.S. government debt. At the same time, the total U.S. federal government debt has exceeded $40 trillion, with net interest payments expected to surpass $1.1 trillion this year—even exceeding defense spending.

Bessent's expanded long-bond buybacks fail to sustain market impact On August 19, the U.S. Treasury announced it would increase the scale of long-term Treasury buybacks from $2 billion per operation to at least $4 billion, targeting bonds with maturities between 10 and 30 years, with the program running from September 9 to November 4. Following the announcement, Treasury yields briefly plummeted, but the market quickly reversed its reaction, with yields climbing again—indicating the policy's limited effectiveness in supporting long-bond prices.

In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Druckenmiller argued that the Treasury's explanation of improving long-term bond market liquidity through expanded buybacks was misleading, as there is currently no genuine liquidity crisis in the market. He noted the absence of failed auctions, stressed balance sheets among dealers, or forced liquidations, emphasizing that trading remains orderly. He further stressed that his 50-year trading career was built on a simple premise: market prices integrate all information that individual policymakers cannot grasp. Long-term Treasury yields are among the most critical prices globally and represent one of the few remaining mechanisms constraining U.S. fiscal policy. Attempting to suppress yields equates to suppressing the warning signals the market is sending.

Don't let the market lose its 'fiscal discipline' function The tension between Druckenmiller and Bessent has drawn particular market attention due to their personal and professional relationship. Bessent once worked alongside Druckenmiller at Soros Fund Management, where Druckenmiller served as a key investment partner to George Soros. Both were known for betting on discrepancies between government policies and market fundamentals through forex and offshore bond trading, with Druckenmiller widely regarded as Bessent's career mentor.

Today, the former market trader has become the U.S. Treasury Secretary, yet his role is starkly different: he must now maintain the stability of the world's most critical bond market.

Druckenmiller warned that rising long-term Treasury yields are themselves a market reflection of U.S. fiscal conditions. Current U.S. inflation hovers around 3% to 4%, well above the Federal Reserve's 2% target. Unemployment stands at approximately 4.1%, nearing full employment levels. The federal fiscal deficit is roughly 6% of GDP. Under these conditions, the 10-year Treasury yield remains close to the U.S. nominal economic growth rate, and from a historical perspective, financial conditions are not particularly tight.

Druckenmiller went so far as to sharply characterize the U.S. Treasury market as not acting as a 'bond policeman,' but rather as having been overly loose for too long and only now beginning to issue warnings—while the Treasury seeks to silence it.

Suppressing yields may merely shift problems to other markets Market participants also worry that deliberate suppression of asset price signals by the government does not eliminate pressure but may transfer it elsewhere. By increasing long-bond buybacks while funding them through short-term Treasury bills, Bessent is effectively altering the duration structure of U.S. government debt, shifting some long-term interest rate risk away from the market.

This approach shares similarities with the Federal Reserve's past 'Operation Twist,' but the problem lies in the Treasury's direct involvement in price formation, which risks blurring the lines between debt management and monetary policy.

Moreover, if the U.S. government attempts to suppress bond yields, the cost may manifest in other asset prices, such as a weaker dollar or higher risk premiums demanded by investors.

Bessent is merely applying a 'band-aid' to U.S. Treasuries The Financial Times offered a broader warning: the U.S. Treasury market has grown increasingly fragile in recent years, primarily due to persistently expanding fiscal deficits, high spending and tax cuts, and rising interest burdens on government debt driven by high rates.

At the same time, the investor base for U.S. Treasuries is shifting. Previously dominated by long-term holders such as central banks, pension funds, and insurance companies, the market now includes more capital that is highly sensitive to interest rates and prices, demanding higher yields as compensation.

Massive data center investments driven by the AI boom have also increased corporate financing demand, intensifying competition for funding across government bonds, corporate bonds, and private credit markets, further pushing up overall borrowing costs.

In this environment, Bessent's recent series of measures—including currency interventions to reduce pressure from Japanese rate hikes or bond sales, and consideration of using Treasury General Account funds for bond buybacks—may temporarily ease market pressure but cannot address the root issues of U.S. fiscal deficits and policy credibility.

From 'Black Wednesday' to today: Bessent now stands on the opposite side of the market The irony is even more pronounced: Bessent's current efforts to stabilize the Treasury market starkly contrast with his past trading experiences. According to the Financial Times, during 'Black Wednesday' in 1992, when the UK government exited the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, the British pound devalued, damaging government credibility. Investors who bet against the pound reaped substantial profits. At the time, a young trader at Soros Fund Management—Bessent—was among those who participated in the trade.

Now, from a trader who bet that government policies could not overcome market forces, Bessent has become a Treasury Secretary tasked with defending the U.S. bond market. He should know better than anyone that the success of government intervention in financial markets depends not just on the amount of funds at its disposal, but on whether the market believes the government has the ability and willingness to address the root causes of the problem.

The real key to suppressing U.S. Treasury yields Bessent himself has previously stated a goal of reducing the U.S. fiscal deficit to around 3% of GDP—roughly half of its current level.

The problem is that if the fiscal deficit remains high, expanded long-bond buybacks by the Treasury will struggle to convince markets that the U.S. government's fiscal trajectory is improving. On the contrary, the more aggressively the government tries to suppress yields, the more markets may suspect policymakers are avoiding the real fiscal issues.

In his op-ed, Druckenmiller invoked historical experience from the 1940s to 1950s, when the U.S. Federal Reserve capped long-term Treasury yields to assist government financing. This policy persisted even after World War II, ultimately leading to inflationary pressures and financial repression until the 1951 'Treasury-Fed Accord' re-established boundaries between fiscal and monetary policy.

Druckenmiller argued that today's policymakers must distinguish between 'debt management' and 'price management' precisely because past efforts came at a cost.

He advocated that the Treasury return to its original purpose for bond buybacks—limiting them to routine operations aimed at improving liquidity for specific bonds rather than expanding buybacks in response to sudden yield spikes. As for where long-term yields should ultimately settle, he believes that should be left to the market.

If the 30-year Treasury yield needs to reach 5.5% to attract sufficient buyers, Druckenmiller contends, this does not signal a market crisis. Instead, it represents a 'bill' the U.S. government must pay. The only sustainable way to reduce this cost is to improve U.S. fiscal health.

The Financial Times echoed this view, stating that if Bessent truly wants to lower long-term Treasury yields, the most effective policy would be to push the Trump administration and Congress to meet deficit-reduction targets—not through continued buyback expansions.

This transforms the current U.S. Treasury market debate from a simple discussion of yield levels into a test of U.S. fiscal policy credibility. For Bessent, the biggest challenge may be convincing markets that the U.S. government is willing to confront the root causes behind high yields.

Other exclusive scoops from Storm Media: - Refusing to be a puppet for Trump's rate cuts, yet offering no answers to the market! What signals will be revealed at the Jackson Hole Global Central Bank Annual Meeting? - With frequent interventions by Bessent, can U.S. Treasury yields be suppressed? This financial game may only be 'treating the symptoms, not the disease.' - NVIDIA's earnings report this week—can it save the 'AI village' again? Wall Street eyes AI bubble warnings, fearing a repeat of 'profit-taking after good news.'