株式会社VARIETAS (Headquartered in Tokyo, hereinafter 'VARIETAS') conducted a large-scale satisfaction survey for its interactive AI interview service, 'AI Interviewer,' targeting 33,467 participants who voluntarily responded between January and March 2026.
Even as the number of candidates in March, a peak period for recruitment, surged approximately ten-fold year-on-year, over half of the candidates (50.4%) gave the highest satisfaction rating of 5. Overall, 89.5% provided positive evaluations, with an average satisfaction score of 4.1 out of 5, proving that the service maintains high quality even at scale.
Feedback from candidates confirms that the AI interview experience is consistently perceived as a 'satisfying experience' during this three-month large-scale operation, not just during the peak recruitment season for specific companies.
'AI Interviewer' Service Site: https://ai-interview.online
Survey Summary
In this survey, more than half of the 33,467 respondents chose the highest score of 5 out of 5. The overall average score was 4.1, with approximately 90% giving a positive rating (3 to 5).
Highest Rating (5): 50.4% (1 in 2 candidates)
Positive Ratings (3-5): 89.5%
Overall Average: 4.1 / 5
Growth in Scale: Approx. 10x Year-on-Year in March
Due to the intense recruitment period, the number of candidates in March 2026 reached approximately ten times that of March 2025. Despite the surge and the diverse backgrounds of candidates, the service maintained stable satisfaction levels and infrastructure performance.
Background of Disclosure
VARIETAS recognizes that AI interviews play a significant societal role at a turning point in people's lives and believes that transparency in service quality is crucial. We are disclosing these results to provide various stakeholders and society with the ability to objectively verify our quality.
Accountability to Candidates
Candidates have the right to know the quality of the service they are being evaluated with. We believe it is our responsibility to create an environment where candidates can accept their selection experience based on objective facts.
Accountability to Corporate Clients
Selection experiences are critical touchpoints linked directly to a company's brand. If candidates feel the service quality is questionable, it directly impacts the client company's reputation and withdrawal rates. Therefore, transparency should be a fundamental premise for companies to adopt AI interviews with confidence.
Building Trust in AI Recruitment
To ensure AI recruitment is accepted as a new technology, the process must be de-blackboxed. We are opening our results to foster social reassurance regarding the 'new normal' of AI recruitment.
Candidate Feedback: Why they value the service
Based on optional comments, candidates view the AI interview not just as a hurdle in the hiring process, but as an opportunity for self-analysis.
1. Sharp and Accurate Questions (Most mentioned) - 'I was surprised by the accuracy of the questions following up on my answers.' - 'The depth and perspective of the follow-up questions were as sophisticated as a human interviewer.' - 'It helped me speak more easily by drilling down logically.'
2. Opportunity for Self-Analysis and Career Growth - 'I was able to organize my experience and thoughts again.' - 'It helped me objectively confirm if I was speaking in a structured manner: conclusion -> reason -> specific example.' - 'It gave me a new perspective for self-analysis and rethink my future career path.'
3. Natural Interaction and Listening feel - 'Even though it wasn't a human, I felt like I was talking to an HR professional halfway through.' - 'It summarized what I said, making me feel like I was truly being listened to.' - 'It successfully grasped the context even when my verbalization was poor.'
4. Balance of Psychological Safety and Convenience - 'Since I wasn't facing a person, I felt relaxed and found it very easy to speak.' - 'It was helpful to be able to take the test whenever it suited my schedule.'
FACT BOX
- Source: PR TIMES
- Category: Survey