Taiwan's food safety crisis has once again sparked public outrage, with numerous citizens taking to the streets on July 25th to express their anger. Facing a food safety storm that directly impacts national health, the DPP government remained lukewarm and delayed disclosure until public pressure became overwhelming. Premier Chen Chien-jen now finds himself in a precarious position, with growing calls for his resignation. The minimum standards of responsible politics cannot continue to be abandoned. The Chen administration's handling of this crisis is a textbook example of passive response. The revelation that Nan Chiao's products under Zhong Lian Oil contained four times the legal limit of the carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene should have triggered an immediate emergency response, thorough investigation, and public notification. However, the Food and Drug Administration under the Ministry of Health and Welfare initially chose to conceal the manufacturer's name, adopting a cover-up attitude. Only after public opinion exploded and public discontent reached a boiling point did they reluctantly disclose the information. As the highest administrative body, the Executive Yuan not only failed to demonstrate leadership and crisis management capabilities in the first instance but also allowed departments to shift blame onto each other, resulting in a complete loss of public trust. In fact, this passive handling of the food safety issue is just the tip of the iceberg of the Chen administration's long-term governance failures. Since Chen Chien-jen took office, controversies and friction have never ceased. On the political front, the rift between the Executive Yuan and the Legislative Yuan has deepened, failing to establish effective cross-party communication channels and often pushing controversial bills with a high-handed approach, leading to unprecedented legislative gridlock. In policy promotion, arguments have repeatedly swayed, and U-turns have been frequent, leaving grassroots and industries exhausted. When facing livelihood issues and public demands, the administration has repeatedly displayed arrogant and detached bureaucratic attitudes. A premier who cannot safeguard national food safety and lacks the ability to resolve political deadlocks has long since exhausted his legitimacy and legitimacy. It is an inevitable choice to maintain democratic responsible politics to step down and take responsibility. Interestingly, as the 'cabinet overthrow' momentum surges, the successor seems to have formed a subtle consensus between the ruling and opposition parties. Whether it is Vice President Lai Ching-te's cryptic remarks about 'using a bigger microphone' or Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an's cross-party thinking, Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chi-mai is seen as a hot candidate for the premiership. However, history is often a mirror. Netizens have dug up Chen Chi-mai's public demand for the resignation of the then premier during the 2014 food safety scandal. Now that the boomerang has returned to the ruling DPP, Chen Chi-mai and party officials' silence cannot help but give the impression of double standards. If he is to take on the heavy responsibility, Chen Chi-mai must face this boomerang test head-on. His governance performance in Kaohsiung is widely recognized, but if he has the opportunity to form a cabinet in the future, can he completely abandon the arrogant attitude of this government, truly put aside party opposition, and demonstrate sincerity in cooperating with the opposition? This is the key to whether he can lead Taiwan out of political deadlock and governance crisis. Taiwan does not need a dysfunctional cabinet that only piles up political rhetoric and turns a deaf ear to public opinion. If the new premier candidate can truly abandon past arrogance, listen to the voices of the grassroots, and implement responsible politics, injecting fresh blood and reform momentum into the central government, it would indeed be fortunate for Taiwan. But the premise for all these changes is very clear: Chen Chien-jen, who has failed in food safety and dereliction of duty, must step down and take responsibility.
FACT BOX
- Source: PR Times
- Category: 人事