A recent case involving the Xinzhuang Police Precinct’s Investigation Unit in New Taipei City has drawn renewed attention. Media outlets cited courtroom testimony from former unit chief Hsu Tzu-Yin, referencing Shi Fu-Cheng, a former squad leader who has been indicted. Shi has now responded publicly for the first time, denying any bribery or abuse of authority, emphasizing his willingness to undergo judicial scrutiny, and urging the public not to form premature judgments based solely on one individual's testimony before a final verdict.
Returning Public Funds from His Sickbed — A Lifelong Officer Unwilling to Bear a Stain on His Record
Regarding the controversy over public unit funds, Shi explained that when he took over administrative duties, there was no formal ledger handed over by his predecessor, nor was there a clear accounting system—contrary to assumptions that strict regulations were already in place.
Shi stated that after being diagnosed with leukemia and taking medical leave for hospitalization, he still made a special trip back to the police station to return all unit funds under his custody to the department. He questioned: if he truly intended to embezzle or gain illicit benefits, why would he voluntarily return the money during his hospital stay?
Accusations of Arresting a Fugitive Due to Personal Grudge — Shi Denies Setting Up a Trap
In response to claims that he helped the son of a former village chief lure and capture a personal enemy, Shi denied any such setup. He emphasized that the suspect, a Mr. Li, had long been a wanted fugitive with multiple criminal records, including illegal firearms, organized crime, unlawful detention, drug offenses, and fraud. He stressed that legally apprehending such individuals is part of the police’s duty to maintain public order and should not be interpreted as acting on personal vendettas.
Shi emphasized that after 36 years of public service, it would be irrational to risk his career, retirement benefits, and lifelong reputation for the small gains alleged by others.
Truthfulness of Testimony for Court to Determine — Calling for Full Evidence to Reveal the Truth
Speaking about Hsu Tzu-Yin’s courtroom testimony, Shi noted that the two previously had disagreements over personnel transfers—Hsu had requested Shi’s reassignment, which was not approved, leading to a deterioration in their relationship. As such, he remains skeptical of the testimony and plans to provide further clarification during the trial proceedings.
Shi expressed respect for the judiciary and confidence that the court will determine facts based on comprehensive evidence. He called on the media to present balanced perspectives and avoid shaping public opinion prematurely before the case reaches a final ruling. The full truth and attribution of responsibility remain subject to judicial review.
FACT BOX
- Source: PR Times
- Category: News