At the height of the 2021 pandemic, the Tzu Chi Foundation, driven by the compassionate desire to save lives, stepped into the procurement of BNT vaccines. Five years later, the case has been resolved—former Changhua Bar Association Chair Chen Yu-hsuan and others, claiming to 'have special channels,' defrauded Tzu Chi of up to NT$1.06 billion in commissions. Prosecutors seized 232 kilograms of gold and over NT$1.11 billion in illicit proceeds, indicting 17 individuals on charges of fraud, breach of trust, and money laundering. However, since the incident came to light, the ruling party has not reflected on its own pandemic policies. Instead, it has seized the opportunity to demand apologies from opposition politicians who once questioned 'the government blocking vaccines,' even having former commander Chen Shih-chung personally step forward to 'whitewash' the narrative. This post-hoc tactic of using a victim's tragedy to conceal governance failure is the true issue that deserves national introspection.

Why did Tzu Chi take this path? The answer lies in the severe vaccine shortage Taiwan faced after May 2021.

To understand why Tzu Chi 'fell for it,' we must return to the dire vaccine shortage Taiwan faced after May 2021, when a domestic outbreak erupted and various civil forces sought to procure vaccines independently to compensate for government supply shortages. On June 23, Tzu Chi formally submitted an application to the 'Ministry of Health and Welfare’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA),' but then-Minister Chen Shih-chung dismissed it, claiming that 'too many procurement channels would cause confusion.' It was not until June 26, after Tzu Chi spoke directly with President Tsai Ing-wen, that the procurement plan finally moved forward. Meanwhile, the Kuomintang (KMT), in collaboration with four county governments—Taitung, Hualien, Yunlin, and Nantou—entrusted Shenghong Medical to procure BNT vaccines. After submitting a formal application, they were repeatedly obstructed during the document supplementation process. The FDA demanded proof that YuLi Medical possessed ultra-cold chain technology capable of maintaining -70°C, even though YuLi was the logistics provider commissioned by Hon Hai and TSMC. Even after submitting the required documents, they were told 'materials are still missing.'

What was the result? Ultimately, only three private entities—Hon Hai, TSMC’s Yonglin Foundation, and Tzu Chi—successfully signed contracts, each procuring 5 million doses of BNT vaccines, totaling 15 million doses. In other words, when a ruling authority claiming to have allocated an NT$880 billion special pandemic budget failed to supply masks, rapid tests, vaccines, medicines, or quarantine hotels, civil society was forced into a 'dead-end' and had to step in to save itself.

Ko Wen-je’s Outrage: Exposing the Flaws in the Ruling Party’s 'Whitewashing' Logic

In response to the ruling party’s offensive—'the truth is now clear; the opposition should apologize'—Ko Wen-je’s rebuttal struck at the core: 'If the government could have bought the vaccines itself, wouldn’t this whole situation have been avoided? By refusing to buy, you forced people into a corner, and now you mock Tzu Chi for being scammed. The DPP shouldn’t treat the public like fools.'

Ko further pointed out that the special pandemic budget amounted to NT$840 billion, yet 'there were no masks, no rapid tests, no vaccines.' The DPP authorities failed to procure vaccines themselves, forcing Hon Hai founder Terry Gou and Tzu Chi’s Master Cheng Yen to take the front lines of procurement. Now, looking back and mocking them with 'you got scammed,' is simply 'morally bankrupt and conscienceless.'

This criticism follows a clear logic: if the government had fulfilled its procurement responsibility initially, Tzu Chi would never have needed to take risks. It was precisely because of government failure that the soil for fraudsters to thrive was created. Using the consequences of forced civilian self-rescue as evidence to argue that 'the government blocking vaccines was correct' is a reversal of priorities—a political sophistry.

Does Chen Shih-chung’s 'Hindsight' Hold Up?

Chen Shih-chung defended himself by claiming that at the time, the government received numerous vaccine fraud reports, all of which relevant agencies investigated and publicly clarified. Tzu Chi was a victim, but during election periods, these anti-fraud warnings were distorted as 'the government blocking vaccines.' This defense has at least two flaws:

First, if they truly knew, why didn’t they name and stop it immediately? KMT Communications Committee Chair Chen Yi-hsin questioned: if Chen Shih-chung knew back then, why didn’t he stop it in time? Why did he even go to the airport with the fraud-involved lawyer Chen Yu-hsuan to welcome the vaccines and take photos together? If he truly didn’t know at the time, what right does he have now to use a fraud case he didn’t know about then to prove his past judgment was correct?

Taipei City Councilor Hou Han-ting further revealed that Chen Yu-hsuan was a legal advisor hired by former Taichung Mayor Lin Chia-lung and had close ties with political figures—could this background have increased Tzu Chi’s trust in him? If the DPP truly wants to pursue responsibility, it should first examine its own anti-fraud mechanisms and risk controls.

Second, where was the 'official channel'? When three private entities successfully procured BNT vaccines, while KMT-affiliated counties were repeatedly blocked during document supplementation, the so-called 'official channel' was effectively monopolized by the ruling authorities. Writer Yang Tao reposted his 2021 article, 'Apocalypse Memo: Those Aren’t Numbers—They Are People, They Are Lives!' and lamented: 'Why did Tzu Chi fall for it? Because they were desperate! If the government hadn’t blocked vaccines back then, would this outcome have occurred?'

The Real Issue: The Cost of Failed Pandemic Governance

Setting aside the emotional blue-green divide, the Tzu Chi $100 million vaccine fraud case exposes three deep-rooted problems:

First, government procurement decision-making failure. Despite allocating an NT$880 billion special budget, vaccines, masks, rapid tests, and medicines were all in short supply, forcing civil groups to perform governmental duties under the guise of charity. When government functions shrink to the point where figures like Master Cheng Yen and Terry Gou must personally step in to fight fires, it is itself a major governance failure.

Second, the politicization of private procurement. The success of Hon Hai, TSMC, and Tzu Chi does not mean all civil efforts were treated fairly. The repeated obstruction of KMT counties during document supplementation shows that the threshold for the 'official channel' was manipulated by political power. Tzu Chi succeeded partly due to its social status and influence; what about other civil groups?

Third, the regulatory vacuum that allowed fraudsters to exploit the gap. Chen Yu-hsuan, as a former Taichung city government legal advisor, leveraged his political resources and social credibility to execute the scam. When the government failed to establish a transparent and efficient vaccine procurement mechanism and did not effectively regulate intermediaries claiming to have 'special channels,' the seeds of tragedy were already sown.

Don’t Let Tzu Chi’s Goodwill Be Re-victimized in Political Struggles

Tzu Chi Foundation has expressed 'deep regret and sorrow' over the case and has entrusted lawyers to cooperate with judicial investigations and defend its rights. A charitable organization, driven by the original intent to save lives, was forced onto a risky path due to government pandemic failure and ultimately scammed out of over NT$1 billion—this bill should not be charged solely to the fraudsters.

Ko Wen-je’s statement, 'Don’t treat the public like fools,' resonated widely because it pierced through the narrative the ruling party tried to construct: as if proving 'private procurement carries risks' could reverse-infer that 'the government blocking vaccines was correct.' This is a logical fallacy and an evasion of responsibility.

The real question has never been 'why was Tzu Chi scammed,' but 'who forced Tzu Chi into having to buy vaccines themselves.' Five years later, the fraudsters have been indicted, gold and illicit funds have been seized, and justice is being served. But political accountability must not be buried—what Taiwan society needs is a sincere comprehensive review of pandemic decision-making, not a political spectacle using victims to cover up governance failure. Otherwise, when the next crisis comes, there will be a second Tzu Chi, a second Master Cheng Yen, pushed into the position that should have been filled by the government.

History will not forget. The people will not forget. The lives lost during the vaccine shortage are the most heartbreaking truth behind this $100 million fraud case.

*Author is an exchange student.

FACT BOX

  • Source: PR Times
  • Category: News