Chiang Wan-an Fighting Alone: Scholar's 5-Point Analysis of the 'Green Camp's Attack on Chiang' and Its Wider Implications

With the 2026 county and municipal mayoral elections approaching, candidate registration deadlines have passed, and political campaigns are intensifying. In Taipei's mayoral race, incumbent Kuomintang (KMT) mayor Chiang Wan-an has recently been forced to personally respond to controversies, including his son Chiang Te-li's eligibility for a student exchange program in the United States.

In the early hours of the 12th, Professor Niu Ze-xun from Chinese Culture University posted a detailed five-point analysis on Facebook, warning that if the KMT central leadership and prominent blue camp figures fail to develop a strategic response to the 'green camp's attack on Chiang,' the situation could become increasingly unfavorable for both Chiang Wan-an and the broader blue coalition. Niu urged the blue camp to quickly establish a counter-strategy, emphasizing that once negative stereotypes take root, reversing public perception becomes significantly more difficult. He concluded his post with the hashtag: 'Chiang Wan-an fights alone; blue camp allies must provide fire support.'

What controversies has Chiang Wan-an recently faced? Regarding allegations of conflict of interest over his eldest son Chiang Te-li's U.S. exchange program, Chiang has repeatedly clarified that all procedures were followed according to regulations, and the government's ethics office has confirmed there was 'no conflict of interest requiring recusal.' Recently, when asked by the media whether he would 'take a DNA test,' Chiang expressed frustration, questioning why he is repeatedly asked to prove paternity during every election cycle.

Niu pointed out that the green camp's persistent attacks on Chiang's 'eldest son' and the DNA issue, while met with some defensive responses from KMT Taichung Mayor Lu Hsiu-yen and other blue camp politicians, remain isolated incidents. These scattered efforts fail to form a coordinated defense network, let alone enable a counteroffensive.

Niu's analysis highlights five key points. First, Chiang Wan-an and Lu Hsiu-yen are the two most electorally powerful figures within the blue camp for both the 2026 and 2028 elections. The green camp has launched a systematic campaign against Chiang, using class-based attacks that are proving effective. This not only limits Chiang's ability to campaign nationally for other KMT candidates ('nationwide election support') but also creates a strategic opening for the 2028 presidential race.

Second, many prominent blue camp figures have failed to effectively defend Chiang. This may stem from a lack of understanding of the green camp's attack strategy or fear of triggering a backlash, leading to silence. However, if the green camp successfully weakens Chiang's political capital, it could damage the overall blue camp electoral prospects and undermine the effectiveness of nationwide campaign support by both Lu and Chiang—especially critical given the current pessimistic outlook in many blue camp constituencies.

Third, Niu recommends that the KMT—its central leadership, legislative caucus, mayoral candidates, and senior figures—adopt a unified 'protect Chiang' strategy. They should first establish a coherent narrative to counter accusations of privilege and class division.

Fourth, the KMT should shift from being mere 'explainers' to becoming 'accusers.' Instead of endlessly defending on isolated issues, the party should proactively expose failures and scandals under green governance to regain the initiative and rally public support.

Fifth and finally, the blue camp must launch a systematic counteroffensive. Beyond responding to attacks, they should redirect focus onto the ruling camp's policy failures. The legislative caucus can open a 'second front,' while local legislators can strengthen institutional critiques. Only through layered, coordinated efforts can an effective counter-system be built to manage reputational damage.

Additional exclusive reports from Storm Media include: - Is Shen Po-yang already abandoned? Kuo Cheng-liang reveals the green camp's true motive for attacking Chiang Wan-an: Taipei's election outcome is no longer a priority. - Major shift in Taipei's election race? Latest approval ratings for Chiang Wan-an and Shen Po-yang revealed; one commentator exclaims: 'Why attack Chiang Te-li?' - Is Shen Po-yang's Taipei campaign in crisis? An analyst exposes the 'three agencies' coordinating attacks on Chiang Wan-an: 'The state apparatus is hunting a minor child.' - Has Chiang Wan-an's Taipei campaign changed? Someone reveals Shen Po-yang didn't anticipate the backlash from attacking Chiang Te-li: vote share may set a new record.